On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:48:52AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:56:51AM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > > > And is the overwhelming majority of interactive scripts that _do_ use > > > debconf already not a huge enough amount? > > > No, it's not "current practice" to use debconf when a bunch of important > > packages specifically don't use it. > > Which ones? The only one I can think of is LILO which appeared to have > less to do with debconf than with the maintainer getting flamed to death > for trashing everyone's configuration.
AFAIK Exim doesn't use debconf (although as soon as I can find time to learn debconf, a bug+patch will be filed - I want Exim non-interactive). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <disclaimer.h> Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
