On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:19:42AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > > aj, who'll be proposing the MUST/SHOULD nonsense be removed from the hands > > of policy when he gets some free time again > I play the evil maintainer who does everything with his packages that > isn't forbidden. > We could set some goals, e.g. I win when I get three packages statically > linked against libc (the idea comes from the thread about gnumeric
And I win when I get you kicked out of the project for good? How about we not play stupid games using our users as pawns in stupid debates, and just get on with *writing some code*. When you find some idiots who don't have good reasons for applying prewritten patches to make their packages install noninteractively, we'll talk. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
pgpOmL8VJruri.pgp
Description: PGP signature
