On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:57:26AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > And is the overwhelming majority of interactive scripts that _do_ use > > > debconf already not a huge enough amount? > > No, it's not "current practice" to use debconf when a bunch of important > > packages specifically don't use it. > Which ones?
wu-ftpd and php4-* were cited earlier, along with lilo. bind was also cited but is apparently fixed. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
