On 1/6/25 10:11 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Personally, my main challenge is having to focus on the same issue
twice, with a minimum delay of 21 days in between. For example, I
encountered an ITS bug that had been lingering in the BTS for over a
year. The waiting period is entirely reasonable under our current
understanding of package ownership, as it allows the maintainer
sufficient time to respond. Shortening this waiting time might have
limited impact, as the person initiating the salvaging process still
needs to set a calendar reminder. I’m unsure how to improve this aspect
within the ITS process.
We could probably automate at least the calendar setting by sending an
ics file with a reminder after 21 days when opening ITS bug (or another
service that queries udd and generate these mails). We could also send
an email reminder when 21 days are over. This would ease the burden on
people filing ITS bugs.