Hi all On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 09:19:26AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Rather than inactive maintainers. For inactive maintainers, we have the ITS > process, which I believe is working (at least better than what we had before > the ITS process).
When introducing the process ad Debconf18 in Taiwan, IIRC one person in the BoF suggested to relax or amend the ITS process, my answer was kind like "we should first try it and then we can make an iteration (not quotes, just out of the back of my brain; didnt rewatch the recordings) Maybe the time to start this discussion is now? What are the shortcomings? How can we adjust / tune the ITS process to make it even more useful. As refererence, for background on thoughts of the process: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00453.html ITS 2.0 would be a good DebCamp Project for Brest, so partners in crime would be very welcome. -- tobi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
