* Boyuan Yang <by...@debian.org> [241221 18:10]: > 在 12/21/2024 12:02 PM, Jeremy Sowden 写道: > > On 2024-12-21, at 17:55:39 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:08:35 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > > > > We DO already have the debian namespace on salsa, everything in this > > > > namespace is "team maintained by everyone.", > > > > > > Is that so? [..] > > From > > https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Collaborative_Maintenance:_.22Debian.22_group: > > > > The debian group is for CollaborativeMaintenance (the old collab-maint > > on Alioth). > > > > The group is accessible to all Debian developers upon linking their > > SSO Account, and are granted Maintainer access levels. Direct commits > > to repositories in the Debian group by any Debian developer are > > implicitly welcome. No pre-commit coordination (e.g. merge-request or > > mail) is expected. > > Obviously the words are only about git commits and nothing more. > > Commits onto a git repo can be reversed easily (via `git revert` > or forced push, if one really wants to), but problematic uploaded > packages to the archive are irreversible and might cause broader > damages.
Uploads to the archive are not irreversible. You can just as well upload a new version reverting whatever was done. Please everybody stop treating the archive as the holy thing that only blessed maintainers can touch. This stance helps nobody. ITS solely for QA work is in the same boat of wrong. Just NMU. Chris
