在 12/21/2024 12:02 PM, Jeremy Sowden 写道:
On 2024-12-21, at 17:55:39 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:08:35 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:We DO already have the debian namespace on salsa, everything in this namespace is "team maintained by everyone.",Is that so? I know that I agree that anybody can commit to my repositories that are in Salsa's debian namespace, but I actually like it when people commit to branches and leave the branches that are released from to myself, and I also expect that I am at least asked (informed) before somebody uploads from one of "my" repos inside the Debian namespace.so putting the package there already declares that.I surely hope that is not true. I'd have to move my packages so a different place then.From https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Collaborative_Maintenance:_.22Debian.22_group: The debian group is for CollaborativeMaintenance (the old collab-maint on Alioth). The group is accessible to all Debian developers upon linking their SSO Account, and are granted Maintainer access levels. Direct commits to repositories in the Debian group by any Debian developer are implicitly welcome. No pre-commit coordination (e.g. merge-request or mail) is expected.
Obviously the words are only about git commits and nothing more. Commits onto a git repo can be reversed easily (via `git revert` or forced push, if one really wants to), but problematic uploaded packages to the archive are irreversible and might cause broader damages. That is why people are okay with allowing random git commits to Debian group but are not okay with uncoordinated uploads. Thanks, Boyuan Yang
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
