On 18/08/2024 11:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2024-08-18 at 14:23 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
[...]--
If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the
architecture — you
can ask for removal of the armel package in testing. That will
allow the
package to migrate even if armel is missing.
This looks to me like a sound solution in this case. After all,
opencpn is a
full-fledged GUI leaf package without reverse deps and zero users
on armel
hardware. But then again, how is this done?
If by this you mean asking for a removal then reportbug
release.debian.org
Not for an architecture-specific removal. Those happen in unstable and
then propagate to testing, so it's ftp.debian.org.
Ah... there is a reportbug utility which is useful here. New
discoveries every day.
Filed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078953
Cheers!
--alec
