On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel? > > If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the architecture — you > > can ask for removal of the armel package in testing. That will allow the > > package to migrate even if armel is missing. > > > This looks to me like a sound solution in this case. After all, opencpn is a > full-fledged GUI leaf package without reverse deps and zero users on armel > hardware. But then again, how is this done?
If by this you mean asking for a removal then reportbug release.debian.org -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
