Hi list,
On 18/08/2024 11:23, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas<leamas.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel?
If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the architecture — you
can ask for removal of the armel package in testing. That will allow the
package to migrate even if armel is missing.
This looks to me like a sound solution in this case. After all, opencpn is a
full-fledged GUI leaf package without reverse deps and zero users on armel
hardware. But then again, how is this done?
If by this you mean asking for a removal then reportbug release.debian.org
I do. But I am new enough to not really understand what "reportbug
release.debian.org"
means...
--alec
