On Sun, 2024-08-18 at 14:23 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > [...] > > > If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the > > > architecture — you > > > can ask for removal of the armel package in testing. That will > > > allow the > > > package to migrate even if armel is missing. > > > > > This looks to me like a sound solution in this case. After all, > > opencpn is a > > full-fledged GUI leaf package without reverse deps and zero users > > on armel > > hardware. But then again, how is this done? > > If by this you mean asking for a removal then reportbug > release.debian.org
Not for an architecture-specific removal. Those happen in unstable and then propagate to testing, so it's ftp.debian.org. Regards, Adam
