Hi Stephen,
On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel?
If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the architecture — you
can ask for removal of the armel package in testing. That will allow the
package to migrate even if armel is missing.
This looks to me like a sound solution in this case. After all, opencpn
is a full-fledged GUI leaf package without reverse deps and zero users
on armel hardware. But then again, how is this done?
--alec
