On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 14:42, Nick Leverton wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:14:41PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 01/01/2012 03:11 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Thomas Goirand <tho...@goirand.fr> writes:
> > >> The other sane way is to mark files not in /etc as conffiles. It
> > >> semantically sux a bit, but if we have no choice because of upstream
> > >> decisions (which we don't have enough time to fix), then that might be a
> > >> way...
> > > That doesn't help unless you expect sysadmins to change them (unchanged
> > > conffiles are quietly updated just like any other package file), at which
> > > point it becomes an FHS violation.
> > I'd like to know: is it a normal thing to edit these files in
> > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d
> > (or, any other file that udev will use and which will be stored in /usr)?
> > Or should we expect that *never* anyone will touch them (eg: there's never
> > a real valid reason to edit them)?
> The latter. If you wish to override them, place the new file in
> /etc/udev/rules.d and the one in /usr/lib/udev won't be used.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You mean:
/lib/udev/rules.d
--
Kind regards, Milan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120101172513.gb29...@arvanta.net
