On 01/01/2012 03:11 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Thomas Goirand <tho...@goirand.fr> writes: > >> On 01/01/2012 01:49 AM, brian m. carlson wrote: >> > >>> So the only sane thing to do is not change the default, ever. >>> > >> The other sane way is to mark files not in /etc as conffiles. It >> semantically sux a bit, but if we have no choice because of upstream >> decisions (which we don't have enough time to fix), then that might be a >> way... >> > That doesn't help unless you expect sysadmins to change them (unchanged > conffiles are quietly updated just like any other package file), at which > point it becomes an FHS violation. > Which is why I wrote "semantically sux a bit" (it's another way to say there's a FHS violation ...). But my understanding is that we have no choice considering the path upstream took.
I'd like to know: is it a normal thing to edit these files in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d (or, any other file that udev will use and which will be stored in /usr)? Or should we expect that *never* anyone will touch them (eg: there's never a real valid reason to edit them)? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f002401.1050...@debian.org
