Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez, 2011-12-30 14:22+0100: > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc > should ship this files in the package in order to let the admin know > what package each file belongs to. Its very ugly to do a "dpkg -S > /etc/xxx" and get a no path found.
Not too problematic as long as that file has a name that make identification easy. I think having the default configuration values written in a default configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. But not shipping the user configuration file, I do not know, that seems ugly somehow. At least the possibility to write a configuration file should be documented, ideally with a manpage. -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo <xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu> <irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar> | `-' Debian Maintainer \_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jdkg5m$ija$1...@dough.gmane.org
