On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:14:41PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 01/01/2012 03:11 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Thomas Goirand <tho...@goirand.fr> writes: > >> The other sane way is to mark files not in /etc as conffiles. It > >> semantically sux a bit, but if we have no choice because of upstream > >> decisions (which we don't have enough time to fix), then that might be a > >> way... > >> > > That doesn't help unless you expect sysadmins to change them (unchanged > > conffiles are quietly updated just like any other package file), at which > > point it becomes an FHS violation. > > > I'd like to know: is it a normal thing to edit these files in > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d > (or, any other file that udev will use and which will be stored in /usr)? > Or should we expect that *never* anyone will touch them (eg: there's never > a real valid reason to edit them)?
The latter. If you wish to override them, place the new file in /etc/udev/rules.d and the one in /usr/lib/udev won't be used. Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120101144201.ga5...@leverton.org
