Hi, So, people have spoken and the response is good. I have done some wiki work to try to move us towards something we can agree on.
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/StandardsOfRespect On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:19:54AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote: > What are your thoughts on adopting some sort of thing? I think it's a > good idea, and we can leave the adaptation and posting to some team > who takes it on and reports back to us. The primary questions seems to be "long and detailed" or "short and general". We have a lot of people pro-short version, but also people suggesting longer versions (perhaps because that's what exists on the internet). Since right now we don't have any short versions to use to guide us, so that was my first priority. Here is what I created (edits welcome): http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/StandardsOfRespect#Short_version It lets people know that we expect excellent behavior, and will intervene to mediate to see that that happens. Right now it seems the best "long version" is from OSDC, as proposed by Holger: http://2010.osdc.com.au/code-conduct http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/StandardsOfRespect#Long_version Who things that we should have a long version? Right now, I think we should get opinions on "short" vs "long", and improvements to both. Hopefully we will get an easy consensus as to which version to focus on, and get it into a workable state. We can add it to the website soon after that, without specifics for this year. Several months out, we can update with the "practical info" and contact information for the harassment point-of-contact. Thoughts? - Richard -- | Richard Darst - rkd@ - boltzmann: up 502 days, 20:27 | http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740 | "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free" _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
