On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:45:04PM -0500, Richard Darst wrote: > So, people have spoken and the response is good. I have done some > wiki work to try to move us towards something we can agree on. > > http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/StandardsOfRespect
In coordination with -women, I've requested to set-up antiharassm...@d.o
as a Debian-wide contact point for policies like the one above. The
address has been setup today by DSA, with Amaya Rodrigo Sastre and Patty
Langasek behind it (BTW, please check you're indeed receiving this mail
twice, for testing purposes).
I'm going to document that address in sprint documentation, but I
believe it would make sense to use the same contact point for other
policies. Could you please consider pointing to it from the above policy
(draft)?
Cheers.
PS I do understand the title of the DebConf policy draft is more general
than "anti-harassment" whereas the latter form is the one used in the
contact address. Still, the address is mentioned in the context of
harassment reports, hence I considered that it was natural to use
such an alias.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
