I agree on the huge-ness of emails, its hard for me to keep up :). The way I see it would be to do it like this, like was Ana was saying but perhaps in softer language ;)
- "accept" the ones we marked as accepted last night, those will go in the main rooms as planned - instead of "rejecting" the rest, we encourage them to lead those sessions as part of the unconference .hc On Jun 3, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote: > These emails are *huge* and the entry cost of reading them slows down > participation from other people. > > After reading them, I feel dkg wants to make the talk selection less > strict and more inclusive. I second that. > > Ana countered with ideas about making it even more strict than what > the current talks team have been working on. I don't think that's > acceptable without re-doing the whole process. And I don't think this > is the time to change to a more stricter criteria. Either we take > dkg's proposal or we go for what was decided last night. > > P. > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
