> > > > > > > > > > What would help comfort these fears? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have wrong thoughts sometimes. I think todo lists are still > > > > > > > > > needed, > > > > > > > > > but maybe our world is so capable that they aren't. Maybe > > > > > > > > > it's more > > > > > > > > > important why I have wrong thoughts. Although there are a > > > > > > > > > handful of > > > > > > > > > explanations, it's concerning that something mysterious may > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > stimulated the wrong thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What seems more concerning is maybe that acting on that isn't > > > > > > > > happening. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl's todo list (don't expect these things to happen!): > > > > > > > > - [ ] make highly secure shielded rooms accessible to everyone > > > > > > > > including him > > > > > > > We need to be safe from where-ever our "behavior modification > > > > > > > built" > > > > > > > habits came from. > > > > > > > This means getting off the internet. Highly advanced digital > > > > > > > security > > > > > > > is much better. > > > > > > > > - [ ] make treatment for severe abuse symptoms accessible to > > > > > > > > everyone > > > > > > > > including him > > > > > > > > - [... etc, tech-and-nature-focused > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But talking about that appropriately might not have been reaching > > > > > > > Todo. We kept on building and researching ... but need to protect > > > > > > > ourself better. > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl, because somebody is still actively harming you, whatever and > > > > > > regardless of what you do, we need a todo list that prioritizes > > > > > > making > > > > > > us personally more and more safe from things that would try to > > > > > > change > > > > > > our decisions. > > > > > > > > > > Also protecting your family. > > > > > > > > This has been a conflict for a long time but we've maybe finally > > > > learned enough about it to sort a little bit of it out. > > > > > > > > We need to go offline, not use devices, not interact with people who > > > > use devices, etc. Does it not work? > > > > > > > > [demands don't quite work ... options work > > > > > > I'm of course okay with things that are good ideas. I was prioritizing > > > myself or strangers because I don't have a solution that reaches > > > safety. One of the influences could be that people I communicate with > > > are influenced to resist what I recommend. If you were on board with > > > recommending it, it would be clearer, it could work better. We'd have > > > to be a little careful. It's hard to relate about the problems > > > accurately; my strategy was instead to retain strategies that could > > > reduce them. > > > > I'm not sure how to influence my family to get offline and mistrust > > strangers and other unplanned events (from being influenced to express > > in harsh ways). > > > > But maybe we could put together a little educational whizzick that > > would help with that. > > [hard. so, i might recommend we move into a cave in radio quiet zone. > because we don't understand the problem and it offers a reasonable > degree of information isolation. but i formed my recommendations not > planning for my family who are used to industry and > telecommunications. honestly, the todo list is very corrupt. but it's > nice to feel better a little
the problem is that i don't know what works, and when working with others we trigger each other. recent learning implies most people have programmed alters, not built from trauma but rather from other things we'd have to approach that situation very carefully, like group-DID, to work together with full rationality but th
