Hi, On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Vitor F. - Killall <x30...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1º if you run other tasks, like web server, mysql server, etc in the same > game server, real time priority can help. > 2º VM in the most case isn't good for gaming servers, because most of servers > providers don't ensures cpu resources. > 3º Don't use hyperthreading for game server. HT will share the same physical > core between 2 logical cores, if the first logical core is busy, the second > will too(partly).
1. Only the servers are running 2. VMs shouldn't make much of a difference. Yes, it may add a little overhead, but not to the extent I'm experiencing, wouldn't you agree? Further, the server it's running on is not even half loaded, so each server is assigned a physical core at this point. 3. HT is enabled...it's a requirement for my host...(understandably so, they have to make a profit somehow without gouging customers...) > 2013/10/28 Absurd Minds <goabs...@absurdminds.net> >> >> Hey there! So what I said earlier please. >> I did and I had this checked. The server is, in fact, running at 3.0GHz as advertised and as one would expect. I replied with a list of the custom variables on the server for everyone's digestion. Everything else is set to stock. Do you see anything inherently wrong with this configuration? Or do you think the problem is exclusively with the kernel not being optimized? >> On Oct 28, 2013 6:49 AM, "Asher Baker" <asher...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> 1. Real-time priority will degrade performance in most cases. >>> 2. Virtual hardware is fine as long as SRCDS gets enough resources - there >>> is no inherent problem with VMs. >>> 3. Hyper-threading is almost pointless on a machine dedicated to SRCDS, as >>> it doesn't make use of multiple threads for the heavy lifting, raw clock >>> speed is a lot more important (although it may be worthwhile for squeezing >>> some perf out if you're trying to run more servers than your hardware can >>> comfortably handle). >>> >>> >>> ~~~~~ >>> "Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, >>> And they went to sea in a Sieve." - Edward Lear I concur with all statements. >>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Артем Добревич <dobrev...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Did you run your srcds process with realtime priority ? >>>> >>>> Pls see that link >>>> >>>> http://www.srcds.com/db/engine.php?subaction=showfull&id=1103579727&archive= AFAIK: No, it's not running with real-time priority. But, since a core is dedicated to my process, I don't see how that would make much of a difference. >>>> The main issue here is that script can works only with root access. >>>> >>>> Also i faced with server FPS drops when my servers was installed on >>>> Virtual Machines. >>>> Hyper threading should be also enabled on server bios. >>>> >>>> >>>> So there is 3 main things >>>> >>>> 1 Real time priority. >>>> 2 No virtual machines. Only host systems. >>>> 3 Hyper Threading. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/10/28 V V <vl910...@yahoo.com> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> you problem " Processor: E5-2690v2 (4 cores)" >>>>> and "CPU Usage: 38.61%" >>>>> why? >>>>> dedicated server dosen't support multithread. >>>>> check "top" and you will see, 1 core have 100%, other 0%. >>>>> how to fix? >>>>> only change processor. >>>>> gl. >>>>> ~~~SNIP~~~ Yes, that is correct. But, even when the server isn't nearly full, the processor utilization is said to be at 100% (with 20 players)... I will also say that I have tried as minimalist of a configuration as possible when it comes to plugins with the DM server (MM, SM, & DM Plugin only) and still had the same choppiness/latency issues. I also appreciate others mentioning they are having the same issues as me. Any further suggestions are noted and appreciated. Thanks, cyberdeath _______________________________________________ Csgo_servers mailing list Csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
