core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v7] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v7] Guanqiang Han
• RFR: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v4] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v5] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Stephen Colebourne
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v7] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v7] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v7] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v2] Pavel Rappo
• RFR: 8367703: Unneeded cast in java.text.DigitList.append Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367703: Unneeded cast in java.text.DigitList.append Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367703: Unneeded cast in java.text.DigitList.append Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367703: Unneeded cast in java.text.DigitList.append Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367703: Unneeded cast in java.text.DigitList.append Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367703: Unneeded cast in java.text.DigitList.append Justin Lu
  • Withdrawn: 8367703: Unneeded cast in java.text.DigitList.append Justin Lu
• RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 Joachim Kern
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 [v2] Joachim Kern
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 Joachim Kern
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 Joachim Kern
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 [v4] Joachim Kern
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 [v4] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Integrated: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 Joachim Kern
  • Re: RFR: 8360401: [AIX] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/FDLeakTest/FDLeakTest.java fails since JDK-8210549 [v3] Joachim Kern
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v61] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v61] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v61] Ivan Walulya
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v61] Andrew Haley
• Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v13] erifan
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v13] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v13] erifan
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v13] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v13] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v13] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v13] erifan
• RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Integrated: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8367619: String.format in outOfRangeException uses wrong format specifier for String argument duke
• Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v12] erifan
• RFR: 8364927: Move SmapsParser from runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes.java into testlib jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8364927: Move SmapsParser from runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes.java into testlib [v2] jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8364927: Move SmapsParser from runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes.java into testlib jonghoonpark
• RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v3] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v2] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v4] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v7] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v8] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v10] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v6] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v12] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v13] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v13] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v13] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v13] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v11] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v5] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v14] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v14] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v14] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v15] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v15] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v15] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v15] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v16] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Erik Joelsson
• Withdrawn: 8357728: Optimize Executable#synthesizeAllParams duke
• RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v58] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v58] Ivan Walulya
• RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v5] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v5] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v4] Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v60] Thomas Schatzl
• Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v5] Aleksei Efimov
• Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? David Alayachew
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Rob Spoor
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Brian Burkhalter

• Earlier messages
• Later messages