core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v2] Vladimir Petko
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v4] Vladimir Petko
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v4] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v4] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v3] Vladimir Petko
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v3] Vladimir Petko
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v3] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v3] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v3] Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v5] Vladimir Petko
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v5] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v5] Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc [v5] duke
  • Integrated: 8387577: [s390x] TestSharedCloseJFR.java failure due to null pc Vladimir Petko
• RFR: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392962: Incorporate JSONTestSuite into test Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8386428: With -UseLSE the Starvation test on Windows ARM64 timeouts [v2] Mat Carter
• RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8393884: MiscTests.testExecutableJARNoManifest fails when -Djava.awt.headless=true is in test VM options Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8393864: Improve equality-related discussion in BigDecimal Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8393864: Improve equality-related discussion in BigDecimal Paul Sandoz
  • Integrated: 8393864: Improve equality-related discussion in BigDecimal Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8382042: Add drill-into and path info to ASN1Formatter [v14] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v16] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8350907: [JMH] test ThreadStartJoin failed for 2 threads config [v2] Yunbo Zhang
• Integrated: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live Jorn Vernee
• RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v2] Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v2] Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v3] Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v3] Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v4] Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v4] Harald Eilertsen
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v4] Greg Lewis
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD [v4] duke
  • Integrated: 8393721: Reduce max SO_LINGER value for BSD Harald Eilertsen
• RFR: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant. Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant [v2] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8392991: SimpleDateFormat CLDR zone name format and parse can change the instant Justin Lu
• New candidate JEP: 547: Lazy Constants (Fourth Preview) Mark Reinhold
• RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError duke
  • Re: RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Ekaterina Pavlova
  • Integrated: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Shiv Shah
• RFR: 8389741: [VectorAPI] Intrinsify Float16Vector.rearrange operations Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v132] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8393047: Arrays.parallelSort sorting of objects is not stable Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Integrated: 8393047: Arrays.parallelSort sorting of objects is not stable Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8393047: Arrays.parallelSort sorting of objects is not stable Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8393047: Arrays.parallelSort sorting of objects is not stable duke
  • Re: RFR: 8393047: Arrays.parallelSort sorting of objects is not stable Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• [External] : Containing Address in BindException Markus KARG
  • Re: [External] : Containing Address in BindException Alan Bateman
• [External] : Operating System and Architecture API Nir Lisker
• Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Jorn Vernee
• RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e duke
  • Integrated: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Andrew John Hughes
• RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo [v2] Stefan Karlsson
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v15] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
• RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Jatin Bhateja
  • Integrated: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Vladimir Ivanov
• RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module Dušan Bálek
• RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Integrated: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
• RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
• [External] : Stable, Cache-aware, Faster sorting algorithm. shreyas patil
• Withdrawn: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion duke
• Re: RFR: 8322292: Rearrange comparison of fields in Record.equals() [v7] Sergey Tsypanov
• RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v12] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v13] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v131] Doug Lea
• [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Alan Bateman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages