On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 09:58:15 GMT, Viktor Klang <vkl...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.java
>> line 407:
>>
>>> 405: if (Modifier.isStatic(modifiers))
>>> 406: throw new IllegalArgumentException("Must not be a
>>> static field");
>>> 407:
>>
>> @viktorklang-ora @DougLea Should we update the Atomic*FieldUpdater to
>> specify the IAE when the factory method is called with a static Field?
>
> @AlanBateman Yeah, I think that makes sense—IIRC it's been that way in
> practice since forever, but making it clear in documentation seems like the
> right thing to do.
Tracked in 8360541; I think we can implement in a separate patch. Don't know if
this is worth backporting to MRs.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#discussion_r2189865695
