Brian,

Can you indicate which versions you would classify as "light" and "heavy"?

René

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have had the 1K, 10K, and 100K instances of Fuego running overnight.
>
> They cover a span of ~600 rating points. This leaves too much space between
> instances, so I will start 300, 3K and 30K instances also.
>
> If the full range of instances are all running, then there will be a Fuego
> every ~150 rating points from ~1850 to ~2600.
>
> I will also fill in the Mogo family by adding a 10K instance and a 1K
> instance. That will spread five Mogo instances evenly from ~1900 to ~2350.
>
> Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Sheppard
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 6:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS
>
> I tried the standard below, but the name Fuego-0.4.1-100K,p is too long:
> name must be no longer than 18 characters.
>
> I considered dropping the final K, but one might actually want to run an
> instance with 100 trials.
>
> So I think dropping the first - is best: Fuego0.4.1-100K,p is 17
> characters.
>
> If you want to do a million trials, use Fuego0.4.1-1M
>
> Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Sheppard
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 8:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS
>
> How about the following:
>
> The "comma" instance named Fuego-0.4.1-1K uses the following rules:
>
>        go_param_rules capture_dead 1
>        go_rules cgos
>        uct_param_player ignore_clock 1
>        uct_param_player ponder 0
>        uct_param_player reuse_subtree 1
>        uct_param_player max_games 1000
>
> At a minimum, the standard should include 1K, 10K, and 100K instances.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Finking
> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 5:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Thanks for picking this up. I've been meaning to post an update for a
> while.
> I tried to set up the Computer Go Wiki site so it is editable by anybody,
> but I'm not sure if that extends to the downloads. If one or more of you
> wants permissions for updating the downloads on the site please shout and
> I'll happily add you to the list of members. Whilst I'm writing, thanks to
> whoever it was who repaired the site a month or two back when somebody
> defaced it with unwanted adverts. It was brilliant by the time I read the
> e-mail telling me somebody had defaced the site, some kind person had
> already spotted it and rectified the problem. Wikis work because people are
> great - thanks :-)
>
> http://computergo.wikispaces.com/CGOS+Standard+Engine+Packs
>
> Raffles
>
> On 25/08/2011 18:06, # van de Veerdonk wrote:
> > +1,
> >
> > Someone needs to also update the download site. If you have a
> > suggested config file and name change, please post it out and I can
> > swap it out.
> >
> > René
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Vlad Dumitrescu <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     At the moment, I'd prefer the first option because I'm caught with
> >     other projects, but the second would work too.
> >
> >     I suppose this involves editing fuegoConfig.txt with appropriate
> >     settings?
> >
> >     regards,
> >     Vlad
> >
> >     On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 18:30, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >     > I am glad to hear that your system is similar to Rene's. :-)
> >     >
> >     > Here are a few courses of action that we can take:
> >     >
> >     >        1) Abandon the existing Fuego-0.4.1,X bots and start new
> >     ones with
> >     > standards like Fuego-0.4.1-100K,X
> >     >
> >     > Or
> >     >
> >     >        2) Measure the trials/turn rate of your existing bots, and
> >     > standardize that Fuego-0.4.1,X means the number of trials that
> >     you are
> >     > getting.
> >     >
> >     > Or both. Or maybe you have other suggestions?
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > Brian
> >     >
> >     > -----Original Message-----
> >     > From: [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     > [mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Vlad
> Dumitrescu
> >     > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:46 AM
> >     > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     > Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS
> >     >
> >     > Hi,
> >     >
> >     > And I am running the ,v versions, on a similar machine and also
> >     > without changing the configuration.
> >     >
> >     > regards,
> >     > Vlad
> >     >
> >     > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:05, René van de Veerdonk
> >     > <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >     >> Brian,
> >     >> I run all the ,V (capitalized) versions (lite and hevy) on a
> single
> >     >>  Windows8-i7-860 machine in parallel. Pretty much out of the
> >     box, I have
> >     > not
> >     >> tinkered with the configuration files (as they ought to be
> >     'standard'). I
> >     >> agree that if they are not hardware independent, that should be
> >     fixed.
> >     >> René
> >     >>
> >     >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Brian Sheppard
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Top line:
> >     >>>
> >     >>>                 - I need to know what configuration is being
> >     used for the
> >     >>> CGOS player named Fuego-0.4.1,V
> >     >>>
> >     >>>                 - If you are the owner, please get in touch
> >     with me
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Details:
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> I just started a Fuego-0.4.1,p on 9x9 CGOS, and I started
> >     suspecting that
> >     >>> something was wrong because it behaved very differently from
> >     the existing
> >     >>> Fuego-0.4.1,V and Fuego-0.4.1,v.
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Digging into the "Hevy" suite of programs, I found that the Fuego
> >     >>> configuration is not limited by iteration count. So really it
> >     is not a
> >     >>> standard opponent. I seem to be running my ,p version on a
> >     more powerful
> >     >>> computer than the ,v and ,V versions.
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> So I have suspended my ,p copy and I am looking for the owner
> >     of the ,V
> >     >>> and ,v copies so that we can coordinate.
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Ideally, we can agree on a named, graduated set of Fuego
> >     instances like
> >     >>> the Mogo3MC3K and Mogo3MC30K instance. I think Fuego-0.4.1-1k,
> >     >>> Fuego-0.4.1-10k and Fuego-0.4.1-100k would make a nice set.
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Thanks,
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Brian
> >     >>>
> >     >>> _______________________________________________
> >     >>> Computer-go mailing list
> >     >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> Computer-go mailing list
> >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> >     >>
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Computer-go mailing list
> >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Computer-go mailing list
> >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> >     >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Computer-go mailing list
> >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Computer-go mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to