Hi Guys,

Thanks for picking this up. I've been meaning to post an update for a while. I tried to set up the Computer Go Wiki site so it is editable by anybody, but I'm not sure if that extends to the downloads. If one or more of you wants permissions for updating the downloads on the site please shout and I'll happily add you to the list of members. Whilst I'm writing, thanks to whoever it was who repaired the site a month or two back when somebody defaced it with unwanted adverts. It was brilliant by the time I read the e-mail telling me somebody had defaced the site, some kind person had already spotted it and rectified the problem. Wikis work because people are great - thanks :-)

http://computergo.wikispaces.com/CGOS+Standard+Engine+Packs

Raffles

On 25/08/2011 18:06, # van de Veerdonk wrote:
+1,

Someone needs to also update the download site. If you have a suggested config file and name change, please post it out and I can swap it out.

René

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Vlad Dumitrescu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    At the moment, I'd prefer the first option because I'm caught with
    other projects, but the second would work too.

    I suppose this involves editing fuegoConfig.txt with appropriate
    settings?

    regards,
    Vlad

    On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 18:30, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    > I am glad to hear that your system is similar to Rene's. :-)
    >
    > Here are a few courses of action that we can take:
    >
    >        1) Abandon the existing Fuego-0.4.1,X bots and start new
    ones with
    > standards like Fuego-0.4.1-100K,X
    >
    > Or
    >
    >        2) Measure the trials/turn rate of your existing bots, and
    > standardize that Fuego-0.4.1,X means the number of trials that
    you are
    > getting.
    >
    > Or both. Or maybe you have other suggestions?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Brian
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > [mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Vlad Dumitrescu
    > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:46 AM
    > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > And I am running the ,v versions, on a similar machine and also
    > without changing the configuration.
    >
    > regards,
    > Vlad
    >
    > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:05, René van de Veerdonk
    > <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >> Brian,
    >> I run all the ,V (capitalized) versions (lite and hevy) on a single
    >>  Windows8-i7-860 machine in parallel. Pretty much out of the
    box, I have
    > not
    >> tinkered with the configuration files (as they ought to be
    'standard'). I
    >> agree that if they are not hardware independent, that should be
    fixed.
    >> René
    >>
    >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Brian Sheppard
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Top line:
    >>>
    >>>                 - I need to know what configuration is being
    used for the
    >>> CGOS player named Fuego-0.4.1,V
    >>>
    >>>                 - If you are the owner, please get in touch
    with me
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Details:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> I just started a Fuego-0.4.1,p on 9x9 CGOS, and I started
    suspecting that
    >>> something was wrong because it behaved very differently from
    the existing
    >>> Fuego-0.4.1,V and Fuego-0.4.1,v.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Digging into the "Hevy" suite of programs, I found that the Fuego
    >>> configuration is not limited by iteration count. So really it
    is not a
    >>> standard opponent. I seem to be running my ,p version on a
    more powerful
    >>> computer than the ,v and ,V versions.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> So I have suspended my ,p copy and I am looking for the owner
    of the ,V
    >>> and ,v copies so that we can coordinate.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Ideally, we can agree on a named, graduated set of Fuego
    instances like
    >>> the Mogo3MC3K and Mogo3MC30K instance. I think Fuego-0.4.1-1k,
    >>> Fuego-0.4.1-10k and Fuego-0.4.1-100k would make a nice set.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>>
    >>> Brian
    >>>
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> Computer-go mailing list
    >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
    >>
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Computer-go mailing list
    >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
    >>
    > _______________________________________________
    > Computer-go mailing list
    > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Computer-go mailing list
    > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
    >
    _______________________________________________
    Computer-go mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go



_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go


_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to