+1, Someone needs to also update the download site. If you have a suggested config file and name change, please post it out and I can swap it out.
René On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Vlad Dumitrescu <[email protected]>wrote: > At the moment, I'd prefer the first option because I'm caught with > other projects, but the second would work too. > > I suppose this involves editing fuegoConfig.txt with appropriate settings? > > regards, > Vlad > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 18:30, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am glad to hear that your system is similar to Rene's. :-) > > > > Here are a few courses of action that we can take: > > > > 1) Abandon the existing Fuego-0.4.1,X bots and start new ones with > > standards like Fuego-0.4.1-100K,X > > > > Or > > > > 2) Measure the trials/turn rate of your existing bots, and > > standardize that Fuego-0.4.1,X means the number of trials that you are > > getting. > > > > Or both. Or maybe you have other suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vlad Dumitrescu > > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:46 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS > > > > Hi, > > > > And I am running the ,v versions, on a similar machine and also > > without changing the configuration. > > > > regards, > > Vlad > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:05, René van de Veerdonk > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Brian, > >> I run all the ,V (capitalized) versions (lite and hevy) on a single > >> Windows8-i7-860 machine in parallel. Pretty much out of the box, I have > > not > >> tinkered with the configuration files (as they ought to be 'standard'). > I > >> agree that if they are not hardware independent, that should be fixed. > >> René > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >>> > >>> Top line: > >>> > >>> - I need to know what configuration is being used for > the > >>> CGOS player named Fuego-0.4.1,V > >>> > >>> - If you are the owner, please get in touch with me > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Details: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I just started a Fuego-0.4.1,p on 9x9 CGOS, and I started suspecting > that > >>> something was wrong because it behaved very differently from the > existing > >>> Fuego-0.4.1,V and Fuego-0.4.1,v. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Digging into the "Hevy" suite of programs, I found that the Fuego > >>> configuration is not limited by iteration count. So really it is not a > >>> standard opponent. I seem to be running my ,p version on a more > powerful > >>> computer than the ,v and ,V versions. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> So I have suspended my ,p copy and I am looking for the owner of the ,V > >>> and ,v copies so that we can coordinate. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Ideally, we can agree on a named, graduated set of Fuego instances like > >>> the Mogo3MC3K and Mogo3MC30K instance. I think Fuego-0.4.1-1k, > >>> Fuego-0.4.1-10k and Fuego-0.4.1-100k would make a nice set. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Brian > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Computer-go mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Computer-go mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Computer-go mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Computer-go mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
