At the moment, I'd prefer the first option because I'm caught with other projects, but the second would work too.
I suppose this involves editing fuegoConfig.txt with appropriate settings? regards, Vlad On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 18:30, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]> wrote: > I am glad to hear that your system is similar to Rene's. :-) > > Here are a few courses of action that we can take: > > 1) Abandon the existing Fuego-0.4.1,X bots and start new ones with > standards like Fuego-0.4.1-100K,X > > Or > > 2) Measure the trials/turn rate of your existing bots, and > standardize that Fuego-0.4.1,X means the number of trials that you are > getting. > > Or both. Or maybe you have other suggestions? > > Thanks, > Brian > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vlad Dumitrescu > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:46 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS > > Hi, > > And I am running the ,v versions, on a similar machine and also > without changing the configuration. > > regards, > Vlad > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:05, René van de Veerdonk > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Brian, >> I run all the ,V (capitalized) versions (lite and hevy) on a single >> Windows8-i7-860 machine in parallel. Pretty much out of the box, I have > not >> tinkered with the configuration files (as they ought to be 'standard'). I >> agree that if they are not hardware independent, that should be fixed. >> René >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> >>> Top line: >>> >>> - I need to know what configuration is being used for the >>> CGOS player named Fuego-0.4.1,V >>> >>> - If you are the owner, please get in touch with me >>> >>> >>> >>> Details: >>> >>> >>> >>> I just started a Fuego-0.4.1,p on 9x9 CGOS, and I started suspecting that >>> something was wrong because it behaved very differently from the existing >>> Fuego-0.4.1,V and Fuego-0.4.1,v. >>> >>> >>> >>> Digging into the "Hevy" suite of programs, I found that the Fuego >>> configuration is not limited by iteration count. So really it is not a >>> standard opponent. I seem to be running my ,p version on a more powerful >>> computer than the ,v and ,V versions. >>> >>> >>> >>> So I have suspended my ,p copy and I am looking for the owner of the ,V >>> and ,v copies so that we can coordinate. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ideally, we can agree on a named, graduated set of Fuego instances like >>> the Mogo3MC3K and Mogo3MC30K instance. I think Fuego-0.4.1-1k, >>> Fuego-0.4.1-10k and Fuego-0.4.1-100k would make a nice set. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Computer-go mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >> > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
