Jeff Nowakowski wrote: > I think this game [go with Hahn scoring; IA] is clearly more > difficult than a binary win/loss game.
That is one of the possible question, and I also vote for "yes", as normal go is simply a Hahn-Go veriant with "coarsened" evaluation. Even more interesting might be this question: Assume, you have humans and bots, all of same strength in traditional go. Which of the groups will be better in Hahn-Go ? Dave Hillis proposed: > It's interesting to consider the problem of writing an agent > to make side bets. There could be a pool of spectator bot, > each calculating an estimate of the final score, after every > move, and placing wagers. I like this idea, even in the generalized version, where humans and bots are allowed to bet on the outcome(s). Ingo. -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
