On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 18:36 +0100, Nick Wedd wrote: > If I had the ability to change the way the game-end protocol is > implemented, I would do so. I do not know what I would implement, but > it might well include Fisher time. However, the implementation is not > under my control. My problem is to make the best use of what is > provided by KGS.
The last time the topic of time came up, it was generally agreed that it is up to the bot to manage its own time, and that absolute time was used to make scheduling easier. Leela lost because it mismanaged its time. I hope you reconsider your position on "probabation" and assigning wins arbitrarily when nothing out-of-bounds has happened. -Jeff _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
