> >Thinking a little more about it, I think we have to add an hypothesis > >which is that, for a given move, the number of AMAF updates if < alpha > >(nb total UCT updates), with alpha < 1. That seems to hold for most of > >the updates (with alpha close to 0.5), but there may be cases where it > >does not hold. > > > > > If I understand well, you say that, in order to ensure consistency, > we need some assumptions on the AMAF updates, > i.e. the MC simulations which decide which move will have AMAF updates.
Yes. _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
