As part of our testing of dimwit I have set up simple life-and-death problems by filling out most of the board with stones of the color on the outside of the problem and by setting the komi so that the result of the game is effectively whether the group in the problem lives or not. This has worked surprisingly well for all the problems I've tried.
Álvaro. On 4/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, although if you're referring to Modification of UCT with Patterns in Monte Carlo Go [Section 3.3] http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/12/15/16/PDF/RR-6062.pdf I was aware of it already... the way I understood is was that in some fixed(?) amount of simulations moves were restricted to the local area and the rest of the simulations were done as usually while _the objective was all the time winning the game_. What I'm am curious about is if Monte Carlo Go/UCT has been used for solving life and death/capturing/connection problems, in which the objective is to determine whether the proposed problem has a solution or not? -Esa On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Chris Fant wrote: > Sylvian's paper on MoGo talks about how they do this on boards larger > than 9x9. Sorry, don't have a link for you. > > On 4/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, I distantly remember a post, where someone said something >> about someone (sorry... I know this is really vaque) working >> on using Monte Carlo Go/UCT to estimate results in subgames, >> i.e., life & death, connection, capture, etc. >> >> Does anyone know, if there are any published results on >> the subject? _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
