On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:15:49PM -0400, Don Dailey wrote: > Actually, I only slightly prefer 5 minutes - it seems like it would > be a benefit all things considered. But as I said, I'm willing to > concede - I will do what the group as a whole prefers. So > far nobody has spoken out in favor of 5 minutes except me - so it > might end up being 10 minutes after all!
Then let me cast a vote for 5 minutes - although it is a very weak vote, as I do not have a strong opinion. But the 2min tests have shown that I seem to have a powerful enough computer to do what I wanted to do... Being able to play more games in a given time is clearly a bonus. - Heikki P.S. How about starting a new round when (say) 75% of the players are free? That way, the last slow ones could skip a round, and most of the rounds would still be with most of the players. -- Heikki Levanto "In Murphy We Turst" heikki (at) lsd (dot) dk _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/