vkagamlyk commented on code in PR #3384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3384#discussion_r3139024500
##########
docker/gremlin-server/gremlin-server-integration-krb5.yaml:
##########
@@ -27,14 +27,21 @@ graphs: {
sink: conf/tinkergraph-empty.properties,
tx: conf/tinkertransactiongraph-empty.properties
}
-scriptEngines: {
- gremlin-lang : {},
- gremlin-groovy: {
- plugins: {
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.server.jsr223.GremlinServerGremlinPlugin: {},
-
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.tinkergraph.jsr223.TinkerGraphGremlinPlugin: {},
-
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.groovy.jsr223.GroovyCompilerGremlinPlugin:
{expectedCompilationTime: 30000},
- org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.jsr223.ImportGremlinPlugin:
{classImports: [java.lang.Math], methodImports: [java.lang.Math#*]},
- org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.jsr223.ScriptFileGremlinPlugin:
{files: [scripts/generate-all.groovy]}}}}
+traversalSources: {
Review Comment:
yes, properties file is most convenient way for providers for additional
graph configuration, It probably makes sense to keep it...
traversalSources and lifecycleHooks are outside of graph, so should have
separate config.
I think @spmallette proposal looks better than mine.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
