On Jul 7, 8:03 pm, logan <duskli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This poisonous attitude is perfectly exemplified in this thread by > James Keats. I completely disagree with your mis-characterization and invite you to read again what I had maintained: - I had implored that technical arguments alone should decide technical issues, not "who's who". - I made clear that I had asked dumb questions, and that I don't consider myself too smart to read what'd been put out already. I made a clear distinction between a newbie who'd ask dumb questions (and explicitly included myself in that category), and a "who's who" from elsewhere demanding major changes outright. - If this is going to turn into a who's against whom (I made it clear time and again I wasn't against Steve Yegge personally but against his "yes language" *features* push, had it come from a Mr firstName lastName I would've still voiced the same technical concern and titled it accordingly), I regret that I do not have the time for that. Regards. J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
