On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote: > We're facing that now, and with a mono-lingual system, you know > everyone can contribute to any part of the project. If different parts > are in different languages, then people working in one area won't > necessarily be able to help with other parts should they need the > help.
Solution: don't have monolingual programmers on your team :) I do understand the forces at play here. I've worked with a lot of monolingual teams and seen these same discussions about wishing we had framework X from language Y. I just cringe at the work invested in recreating all these frameworks in so many languages - especially when we're (nearly) all on the same JVM and we _could_ leverage these other languages / frameworks as-is. It just seems like so much wasted effort :( I'll shut up about this now... -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
