Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote ..
> Why are folks so insistent on monolingual systems?
We're facing that now, and with a mono-lingual system, you know
everyone can contribute to any part of the project. If different parts
are in different languages, then people working in one area won't
necessarily be able to help with other parts should they need the
help.
Of course, what you're calling "insistent" is just people wanting to
the frameworks to exist so they *can* do that, not really insisting
that some current system be monolingual in spite of that lack. Even
the above (admittedly minor) advantage to monolingual systems is
enough to justify wanting those frameworks even while you're building
multilingual systems.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
