On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Mike Meyer
<mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote:
>> Solution: don't have monolingual programmers on your team :)
> What, we shouldn't hire Americans? :-)

Normally that joke is aimed at Brits like me :)

> That only helps if everyone actually knows all the languages involved

Well, smart people pick up new languages pretty easily and you don't
need _experts_ in all those languages to make it work.

> Except (in least in this case) some of the languages aren't on the
> JVM. In fact, I'm starting to get pressure against Jython and Clojure
> because of the legal mess that's starting to embroil the Java
> world. Way off topic, but anyone got any advice on *that*?

That's an interesting one. In my opinion it's a very paranoid (and
uninformed) company that actually thinks they need to worry about
*JVM*-based languages. There are multiple JVM implementations and none
of the important ones are the subject of litigation.

If you're not building Java-based apps for Android, why would they care?
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to