On 31/05/2010, at 11:13 AM, Marc Spitzer wrote: > I actually primarily do not care about mac or windows, personally or > professionally. Also keep in mind that one of the selling points of > clojure is that it runs where *Java* runs not mac and windows, I would > think that in my mind anyway, be a strong contributing point. Now to > be honest I am responsible for Macs at work but hopefully less of them > as time goes by.
This is obviously another input into Luke's decision making. What kind of apps does he want to target, what kind of developers, what platforms, with what intentions. > Have you ever heard of DLL HELL? It is a special case of library path > issues, they exist every where you have shared libs/DLLS being loaded. That only happens if you try to share the DLL, which isn't necessary. > And as a sysadmin I have had LD issues with OSX. Consumer apps using SWT don't have this problem on OSX. > your right we should all be using pcbsd much better, http://pcbsd.org/ LOL. > native integration is not quality, quality is quality native > integration is look and feel. which is an essential part of quality from a user's perspective for the two consumer desktop platforms. Antony Blakey -------------------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 The project was so plagued by politics and ego that when the engineers requested technical oversight, our manager hired a psychologist instead. -- Ron Avitzur -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
