Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:05:13 +0200 > Thierry Besancon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Please freeze this devel version and release a 0.93.2 version to >> fix this problem. >> > > Next time please give a try to the RC versions >
Thierry Besancon wrote: > On 2008-06-13 14:45:29, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:33:49 +0200 >> Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Yes, I can reconfirm the good work of fix. >>> >>> # freshclam >>> ClamAV update process started at Fri Jun 13 14:31:55 2008 >>> main.cvd is up to date (version: 46, sigs: 231834, f-level: 26, builder: >>> sven) Downloading daily-7464.cdiff [100%] >>> daily.cld updated (version: 7464, sigs: 84189, f-level: 31, builder: >>> ccordes) Database updated (316023 signatures) from database.clamav.net (IP: >>> 193.206.139.37) >>> >>> >>> Waiting for stable version, >>> >> To make the things clear: we have no plans for releasing 0.93.2 as it >> would affect our schedule for 0.94. The problem you're facing could >> get fixed in 0.93.1 if more people gave it a try. Unfortunately, this >> issue depends on the zlib version installed (only some versions are >> affected) in the system that's why we couldn't reproduce it on our test >> boxes. The development version uses a different method for handling >> .cld files and it's not affected by this problem. The best I can do for >> you is to create a patch against 0.93.1 which will replace the current >> code for handling database files with the one from clamav-devel >> > > If you can create such a patch, why can't you apply it against a 0.93.1 > release and name the result 0.93.2 ? The bug is identified, isn't it ? > > The bug is quite severe. It stops my production server for one night. > As the bug only appears when new signatures are available, I had hard > time finding what may goes wrong. I subscribed to the mailing list > to look if other people were encountering the bug too. I tried to > search the archives that weren't not available because some html page > were zeroed. I started debugging the code too. So i can't accept > the easy answer "The problem you're facing could get fixed in 0.93.1 > if more people gave it a try". I gave it more than a try. Tomasz was refering to giving a try to RC versions, if the bug would have been found in the 0.93.1-rc version, then it could have been fixed in 0.93.1. Best regards, --Edwin _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
