Re: [Clamav-users] all this "complaining" about 0.65 vs CVS ...

[Keith Patton]

I concur..  We run Norton on the desktops and clamav on our mail servers. It is usually a toss up which one updates the signature list for a new virus first..

The activity on this list is so good, I usually inform others what new virus is out before Norton, etc..  lets them know...

Great list, and an outstanding job and effort by the developers..

thanks to all..


my  thoughts..
-Keith

Antony Stone wrote:

On Tuesday 10 February 2004 4:53 pm, OpenMacNews wrote:

  

in my experience and opinion, this list -- and the great team and product
behind it -- is one of the most active/responsive opensource products that
i've seen
    

I agree.

  

bottom line, clamav is STILL a < 1.0 release.  if you're going to use it in
a production environment, AND want all the latest/greatest features then DL
cvs, build it and use it ... daily, if you have to.

if that's too much effort, or not-acceptable for your production env, then
should you be using a pre-release product in the first place.
    

Well said.

  

maybe its just me and/or the recent spate of posts, but a little
less-complaining, and a few more THANK YOU's to the team would be a nice
change ....

just one man's opinion.
    

My opinion too.   Well done to the development team, and to those others who 
create signatures for us all.   An Open Source antivirus product which 
catches new viruses quicker than many commercial systems is an amazing 
achievement.

Thank you from me as well.

Regards,

Antony.