On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 at 17:20:46 +0100, Cedric Foll wrote: > > No, it doesn't. > > I wrote it because 0.65-BugFixesFromCVS-20031123 is the oldest version I > > use. In fact, it's exactly the version which I use on my production > > server. Amavisd-new takes care of proper "deMIME'ing" messages, > > extracting attachments etc. ClamAV just scans extracted parts and I'm > > happy with it. > > OK. But I use clamd without amavis and I'd really enjoy if clamd would > be able to 'deMIMEing' attachement without help of any external program. > And 0.65 seems to not be able to do it. > So we have to use a CVS version or use an external program to extract > attachements ? >
I admit that I'm quite focused on "Postfix + Amavisd-new + ClamAV" solution (I don't know details of milter and so on) so maybe I'm missing something... But what do you mean by "I use clamd without amavis"?... No amavis, no milter, only alone clamd? Maybe you use clamav-milter, but you just didn't mention it... I think that one can't help you not knowing more details of your setup. In case you use clamav-milter: it's being very actively developed by Nigel and I believe that the current version is far more powerful than 0.65. -- Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/ | ones and zeros. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ClamAV.net/ A GPL virus scanner ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
