On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 at 15:47:13 +0100, Cedric Foll wrote: > > > Added: No. Worm.SCO.A found even with 0.65-BugFixesFromCVS-20031123. > > > No, it is not deprecated. The comment "Folks, stop wasting our time, > > please!" means "we've been detecting Worm.SCO.A for ages now; please stop > > sending us more samples." > > Perhaps it's because my english sucks but for me 'Worm.SCO.A found even > with 0.65-BugFixesFromCVS-20031123' means that 0.65 can't detected it.
No, it doesn't. I wrote it because 0.65-BugFixesFromCVS-20031123 is the oldest version I use. In fact, it's exactly the version which I use on my production server. Amavisd-new takes care of proper "deMIME'ing" messages, extracting attachments etc. ClamAV just scans extracted parts and I'm happy with it. I even had not to mention this "0.65-BugFixesFromCVS-20031123" in the announcement. I did it to stress the degree of "excessiveness" of that submission. It would be sufficient if any current version would detect the infection. -- Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/ | ones and zeros. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ClamAV.net/ A GPL virus scanner ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
