Slight modification, I am looking for fib for ASR 1002-HX , RIB is available.
Regards, Vikas On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 7:04 am Vikas Sharma, <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Luka, > > Thanks for your revert. I have checked all ciscolive presentation before I > have shooted question to the forum. I understand, LPM and LEM along with > iTCAM support on C 540 does not exceed 400k but I was not getting details > on rib/fib on ASR 1002-HX, in case you have found, please share with me. > > Also, processing power of ASR vs C 540 is very different, one with quard > core 1.2 GHz and another with 2.5 GHz, so I was also wondering if BGP > scanner process will be good with which. If 540 can take care of scanning > process!! > > Also internet does not inform about table-map (atleast, I couldn't find), > on C 540, many thanks to Jason for details provided. > > Anyway, many thanks for the kind revert. > > Regards, > Vikas > > On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 6:44 am Łukasz Bromirski, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Vikas, >> >> First of all, NCS 540 ACC-SYS has 16GB of RAM. >> >> For NCS 540, slide 43: >> >> https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKSPG-2159.pdf >> >> Essentially, around 380k depending on prefix distribution. >> >> For ASR 1002-HX it’s here: >> >> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html#PerformanceandScaling >> >> Please use your favorite search engine first in future. >> >> — >> ./ >> >> On 9 Jul 2020, at 02:48, Vikas Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Many thanks Jason for your quick response. >> >> If possible please also confirm the rib/fib limits of ASR1002-HX. >> >> I have two choices to be used as IGW, ASR1002-HX or C 540 X and I want to >> choose the best of the two options. >> >> Regards, >> Vikas >> >> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 12:52 am Jason Lixfeld, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I don’t know the exact RIB scale, if there is one, short of what available >> memory will hold. That said, it’s got 8GB of memory, and I’ve seen 1.7M+ >> BGP prefixes with the BGP process consuming about 1.9GB of memory. >> >> It won’t hold a full table in FIB. 350K max, protocol independent, >> depending on the prefix size. >> >> SRD is implemented using table-policy. >> >> On Jul 8, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Vikas Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear, >> >> Can someone please confirm how many routes are supported in above model >> >> in >> >> both rib and fib? >> >> Also, I am not able to find table-map command for this router. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Regards, >> >> Vikas >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
