Many thanks Jason. Regards, Vikas
On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 6:39 am Jason Lixfeld, <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m not as familiar with the ASR1002-HX, but what I’m pretty sure of is if > you’re considering the ASR1002-HX for IGW, you may want to review Juniper’s > MX204. It’s probably going to be slightly more expensive than a NCS540, > but far less expensive than the ASR1002-HX, but overall it will be a much > better bang for your buck as an IGW. > > On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:48 PM, Vikas Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > Many thanks Jason for your quick response. > > If possible please also confirm the rib/fib limits of ASR1002-HX. > > I have two choices to be used as IGW, ASR1002-HX or C 540 X and I want to > choose the best of the two options. > > Regards, > Vikas > > On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 12:52 am Jason Lixfeld, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I don’t know the exact RIB scale, if there is one, short of what >> available memory will hold. That said, it’s got 8GB of memory, and I’ve >> seen 1.7M+ BGP prefixes with the BGP process consuming about 1.9GB of >> memory. >> >> It won’t hold a full table in FIB. 350K max, protocol independent, >> depending on the prefix size. >> >> SRD is implemented using table-policy. >> >> > On Jul 8, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Vikas Sharma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Dear, >> > >> > Can someone please confirm how many routes are supported in above model >> in >> > both rib and fib? >> > >> > Also, I am not able to find table-map command for this router. >> > >> > Any suggestions? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Vikas >> > _______________________________________________ >> > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
