> On Jul 8, 2020, at 9:14 PM, Łukasz Bromirski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Vikas, > > First of all, NCS 540 ACC-SYS has 16GB of RAM.
… but only 8GB available to the RP. RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ncs540-7.lab#show memory summary Wed Jul 8 21:19:33.842 EDT node: node0_RP0_CPU0 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Physical Memory: 8192M total (5333M available) Application Memory : 8192M (5333M available) Image: 4M (bootram: 0M) Reserved: 0M, IOMem: 0M, flashfsys: 0M Total shared window: 410M RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ncs540-7.lab#show platform Wed Jul 8 21:20:04.260 EDT Node Type State Config state -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0/RP0/CPU0 N540-ACC-SYS(Active) IOS XR RUN NSHUT 0/RP0/NPU0 Slice UP 0/FT0 N540-FAN OPERATIONAL NSHUT 0/FT1 N540-FAN OPERATIONAL NSHUT 0/FT2 N540-FAN OPERATIONAL NSHUT 0/FT3 N540-FAN OPERATIONAL NSHUT 0/PM0 N540-PWR400-D OPERATIONAL NSHUT 0/PM1 N540-PWR400-D FAILED NSHUT RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ncs540-7.lab# > > For NCS 540, slide 43: > https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKSPG-2159.pdf > > <https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKSPG-2159.pdf> > > Essentially, around 380k depending on prefix distribution. > > For ASR 1002-HX it’s here: > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html#PerformanceandScaling > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html#PerformanceandScaling> > > Please use your favorite search engine first in future. > > — > ./ > >> On 9 Jul 2020, at 02:48, Vikas Sharma <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Many thanks Jason for your quick response. >> >> If possible please also confirm the rib/fib limits of ASR1002-HX. >> >> I have two choices to be used as IGW, ASR1002-HX or C 540 X and I want to >> choose the best of the two options. >> >> Regards, >> Vikas >> >> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 12:52 am Jason Lixfeld, <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don’t know the exact RIB scale, if there is one, short of what available >>> memory will hold. That said, it’s got 8GB of memory, and I’ve seen 1.7M+ >>> BGP prefixes with the BGP process consuming about 1.9GB of memory. >>> >>> It won’t hold a full table in FIB. 350K max, protocol independent, >>> depending on the prefix size. >>> >>> SRD is implemented using table-policy. >>> >>>> On Jul 8, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Vikas Sharma <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear, >>>> >>>> Can someone please confirm how many routes are supported in above model >>> in >>>> both rib and fib? >>>> >>>> Also, I am not able to find table-map command for this router. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Vikas >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>> <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> >>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
