Robert, Sorry to hear the news. I know it must be frustrating but the last thing you should do is give up. Take a short break and keep going at it. You will pass if you keep learning.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]>wrote: > I failed miserably. > > I thought I did well til I got my score. > > Zero on qos > Zero on ios features > 25 on bgp. > > I thought I nailed all these topics. I don't understand how I got zero > points. > > So much 10 years of experience and one solid year of cramming of the exam. > ------------------------------ > > * From: *Carlos Valero [[email protected]] > * Sent: *07/02/2009 02:41 PM MST > * To: *Joe Astorino <[email protected]> > > * Cc: *[email protected] > * Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q > Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces > > Hello Joe, > > Any word on this? > > I'm just curious to know how you are able to do Trunking on a 10-BaseT > interface. > > I thought that wasn't possible. At least not on a 2610! > > I've tried with several IOS versions including the latest one (12.3.26) and > the "encapsulation" command is not available. > > Please let me know. Thank you! > > > > --- On *Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet > 10-BaseT interfaces > To: "Carlos Valero" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 7:53 PM > > Hi Carlos, > > As soon as I can get access to a Proctor Labs rack, I will let you know. > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Carlos Valero > <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> >> >> >> Hello Joe, >> >> Could you please tell me what IOS version you use in your 2610 BB >> Routers? >> >> Labs Vol 3.9 & 3.10 use encapsulation dot1q on the Ethernet interfaces >> on these Routers. >> >> But so far I have NOT found an IOS version that allows do1Q on an >> Ethernet interface. >> I thoughy you could only do that with a Fast Ethernet interface. >> >> Could you please let me know? >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> --- On *Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> >* wrote: >> >> >> From: Joe Astorino >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology >> To: "'Terry Vinson'" >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>, >> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 2:06 PM >> >> Hey Terry, >> >> Well, in our topology we have Cat2-Cat4 as 3560 like you said. I would >> have >> to go through every lab and really see if there are any situations where >> you >> HAVE to have a 3560 to do something on a particular switch. >> >> Regards, >> >> Joe Astorino >> CCIE #24347 (R&S) >> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry Vinson >> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:57 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> I use dynamips and 4 real switches in my personal rack. I have 2 3550's >> and 2 3560's. I see that the Version 11 Workbook 1 topology has 3 >> 3560's, well that's not happening financially over here for quite >> sometime (if ever if my wife is to be believed). My question is where >> should I use the 2 3560's to get the best coverage of capabilities? I >> have to assume it will make a difference on some of the Switching labs, >> but I don't see a huge impact on the layer 3 stuff other than IPv6. >> >> Thanks, >> Terry >> >> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2210 - Release Date: 07/01/09 >> 05:53:00 >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Joe Astorino > CCIE #24347 (R&S) > Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > > > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
