----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Bushnell BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <bug-hurd@gnu.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If a driver is redundant, then we have no need to care about it.
If a driver doesn't work, we should not include it.
If a driver doesn't work, then it should be fixed.
It is appalling that you should so conveniently trim my words for me.
What I added to the above is:
"The only exceptions are where there is a concrete plan to make a
non-working driver into a working one."
So, if you are volunteering to fix the driver, great. But there is no
need to keep it around on the random chance that someone may someday
fix it.
Thomas
Instead of arguing over a mailing list how about both of you go about fixing
drivers?
*hides*
Barry (aka bddebian)
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
