On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:15:32PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Is there some kind of logic to how you split up the ChangeLog entries?
What exactly don't you understand about it? > How did you check that the files are ok to remove (it is a long list, > so it is hard to check each file)? I checked it by verifying against GNU Mach's build system. > i386/utils/debug.h looks a > suspicious for example. Why? > I'm not sure what `adopt all users' means. Maybe you mean callees? I mean all places where the macro is used; `NHD' was defined in i386/bogus/hd.h to zero, now I adopted all the places where `NHD' was used in the code to the case of it being defined to zero. I'm open to hear suggestions for better wording, of course, but I'm not yet convinced that ``callees'' is more appropriate. Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
