"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Would there be any objections if I'd remove all native device > > drivers from the gnumach-1-branch that are not used anymore? > > > > Care to explain what that would achive? Wouldn't it be better to > > simply make the native drivers work? > > We don't have any need to make drivers work which are redundant. > Since we have CVS, it is good not to include code which we don't > use and don't have any plans to use. > > `All native drivers' does not equal to `redundant' or `don't have any > plans to use'.
I didn't say they mean the same thing. Please respond to the actual points I make, rather than irrelevancies. If a driver is redundant, then we have no need to care about it. If a driver doesn't work, we should not include it. The only exceptions are where there is a concrete plan to make a non-working driver into a working one. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
